REPLY BRIEF ON APPEAL OF DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE AT WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS

A reply brief was filed on February 3, 2014, Appeal NO. 2013AP002029.  The reply argument is "Under Concurrent Sentences All Confinement Run Together And All Parole And Extended Supervision (TIS Parole) Run Together It Is The Law.

1.  Common law certiorari is the appropriate method for reviewing refusal to grant discretionary parole.
2.  The judgment of conviction does not regulate confinement and parole its authority can be found in Wis. Stat. 972.13 (3).
3.  The judgment of conviction does not regulate confinement under indeterminate sentences because those sentences have discretionary parole that is determined by the parole commission and mandatory release an entitlement granted by the legislature.
4.  Determinate sentences under Truth-in-Sentencing are not regulated by the judgment of conviction because the legislature determined that an inmate's term of confinement in prison and term of extended supervision (parole) shall be adjusted pursuant to subsection 973.195 (1r) (g) (85% for class C to E felony and 75% for a class F to I felony).