Wisconsin Court of Appeals District 1

I filed my notice of appeal challenging the decision and order denying my discharge certificate for case #05CF63, violations of Wis. Stats. 943.20 (1) (b) and 943.38 (2).  The discharge certificate states that "you (talking about me) have satisfied said judgment"  An inferior non legal mind would understand this to mean that the person who received this discharge certificate has completed the sentences that make up his judgment of conviction, right?  That's not all; this legal document further states that "it is ordered that effective July 27, 2012, you are discharged from said judgment only".  Signed by the Secretary of Wisconsin Department of Corrections, who is responsible for the care and safety of the person until his civil rights are restored by the department.  The department has not amended, corrected, withdrawn or issued a different discharge certificate.

September 12, 2013, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District 1, assigned Appeal No. 2013AP002029, Circuit Court Case No. 2013CV006447, three judge appeal.

The briefing schedule should be sent soon.  This has been a legalized screwing mastered by legal magicians who excel at the art of misdirection.  They promote deprivation of liberty without the mandated legal procedures and safeguards, fail to observe the laws of the State of Wisconsin and practice a blatant bias disregard of the charter of its existence.  God Bless America!!

Life and Death Challenge Appeal of Civil Case 2013CV006447

This is not a physical death, however, metaphorically it can be a death if I allow the Milwaukee Circuit Court to kill my case. As the psalm of David states; "though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil:  for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me".  I choose life because there is victory in life.  I mailed my appeal on September 03, 2013, to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals District I in this life choice moment case 2013CV006447 decided July 24, 2013 is not dead.

This issue of law; "the restoration of a person's civil rights after the issuance of a Discharge Certificate" from the prison was decided by a judge and a party who disagrees with those rulings can appeal them to a higher court.

The court of appeals decides if the rules were followed, like referees in a game of sport.  The court of appeals usually answers the following questions:

1.  Did the circuit court comment a foul?
2.  Did the circuit court properly apply source evidence in this case?
3.  Did the judge use accurate factual information and give adequate reasons for the decision?
4.  The court of appeals decides only legal issues.