There is a time for everything. My first Discharge Certificate was issued September 4, 2012. The state says "All counts in this case are treated as one sentence". In 2012, the state said there were two sentences "A-01" case and "A-B" case.
How To Get Away With White Collar Crime
Become a Government Official
Court House
No Justice!!!
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Friday, March 8, 2019
Monday, March 4, 2019
REQUESTING ACTION FOR MANDAMUS - ATTORNEY GENERAL - PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST AUGUST 2018
The folks at the Wisconsin DOC would not respond to my open records request so I had to contact the top law enforcer in Wisconsin.
Thursday, February 14, 2019
Saturday, November 10, 2018
ILLEGAL VOTING v. ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT
THE "DON" Our President has promised that anyone caught voting improperly would be subjected to "maximum criminal penalties".
I say the same should apply to those government officials responsible for illegal imprisonment.
Our former U.S. Attorney General Sessions said; "fraud in voting process will not be tolerated. Fraud also corrupts the integrity of the ballot".
I say fraud in the legal system should not be tolerated because it corrupts the integrity of the rule of law.
There is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in the United States. However, there is plenty of evidence of illegal imprisonment in the United States.
I say the same should apply to those government officials responsible for illegal imprisonment.
Our former U.S. Attorney General Sessions said; "fraud in voting process will not be tolerated. Fraud also corrupts the integrity of the ballot".
I say fraud in the legal system should not be tolerated because it corrupts the integrity of the rule of law.
There is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in the United States. However, there is plenty of evidence of illegal imprisonment in the United States.
Saturday, November 3, 2018
WISCONSIN LEGAL SYSTEM v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS part 2
The Honorable Michael J. Dwyer Branch 16, State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Milwaukee County case 16-CV-8841 Lee v. Litscher, Sec. Wis. Dept. of Correction issues a "NOTICE and ORDER for BRIEFING", November 22, 2016, rather than a hearing before the court to safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless State action. This briefing order can take years to complete.
The question is whether or not Lee should be released from custody under 973.01(4m)(a) Act 28. A law that states: "The department may discharge a person from extended supervision after he has served 2 years of extended supervision if the person met the conditions of extended supervision and the reduction is in the interest of justice".
Act 28 early release laws became law in 2009. Retroactive for all crimes committed beginning December 31, 1999. It was repealed in 2011 by Act 38. In 2014 the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time (early release from prison) by Act 38 violated the ex post facto clause of the state and federal constitutions. In 2016 the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed. . ., holding (1) the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time is an ex post facto violation, and (2) 2011 Wis. Act 38 violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because it results in a longer period of incarceration and, consequently, makes the punishment for an offense more burdensome after it was committed. This is the law under Wisconsin Legal System.
It appears that the Wisconsin Legal System's intentions are to have every prisoner complete his original sentence no matter what the law commands.
The question is whether or not Lee should be released from custody under 973.01(4m)(a) Act 28. A law that states: "The department may discharge a person from extended supervision after he has served 2 years of extended supervision if the person met the conditions of extended supervision and the reduction is in the interest of justice".
Act 28 early release laws became law in 2009. Retroactive for all crimes committed beginning December 31, 1999. It was repealed in 2011 by Act 38. In 2014 the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time (early release from prison) by Act 38 violated the ex post facto clause of the state and federal constitutions. In 2016 the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed. . ., holding (1) the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time is an ex post facto violation, and (2) 2011 Wis. Act 38 violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because it results in a longer period of incarceration and, consequently, makes the punishment for an offense more burdensome after it was committed. This is the law under Wisconsin Legal System.
It appears that the Wisconsin Legal System's intentions are to have every prisoner complete his original sentence no matter what the law commands.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












