PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST NO RESPONSE

ILLEGAL VOTING v. ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT

THE "DON" Our President has promised that anyone caught voting improperly would be subjected to "maximum criminal penalties".

I say the same should apply to those government officials responsible for illegal imprisonment.

Our former U.S. Attorney General Sessions said; "fraud in voting process will not be tolerated.  Fraud also corrupts the integrity of the ballot".

I say fraud in the legal system should not be tolerated because it corrupts the integrity of the rule of law.

There is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in the United States.  However, there is plenty of evidence of illegal imprisonment in the United States.

WISCONSIN LEGAL SYSTEM v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS part 2

The Honorable Michael J. Dwyer Branch 16, State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Milwaukee County case 16-CV-8841 Lee v. Litscher, Sec. Wis. Dept. of Correction issues a "NOTICE and ORDER for BRIEFING", November 22, 2016, rather than a hearing before the court to safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless State action.  This briefing order can take years to complete.

The question is whether or not Lee should be released from custody under 973.01(4m)(a) Act 28.  A law that states:  "The department may discharge a person from extended supervision after he has served 2 years of extended supervision if the person met the conditions of extended supervision and the reduction is in the interest of justice".

Act 28 early release laws became law in 2009. Retroactive for all crimes committed beginning December 31, 1999.  It was repealed in 2011 by Act 38.  In 2014 the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time (early release from prison) by Act 38 violated the ex post facto clause of the state and federal constitutions.  In 2016 the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed. . ., holding (1) the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time is an ex post facto violation, and (2) 2011 Wis. Act 38 violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because it results in a longer period of incarceration and, consequently, makes the punishment for an offense more burdensome after it was committed.  This is the law under Wisconsin Legal System.

It appears that the Wisconsin Legal System's intentions are to have every prisoner complete his original sentence no matter what the law commands.

WISCONSIN LEGAL SYSTEM v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Habeas Corpus is "YOU HAVE THE BODY" 

I filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus November 15, 2016 case number 16CV008841.  It was assigned to the Honorable Michael J. Dwyer, Branch 16.  The fee of $168.00 was returned; "There is no charge for a writ of habeas" according to Chief Judge Maxine A. White.

I know Judge Michael J. Dwyer he and I were members of the same Milwaukee Rotary Club back in the 80's.

A writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that a prisoner be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody.  The State of Wisconsin had custody of my body and I objected because the Supreme Court of the United States has "recognized the fact that [t]he writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action"  "Therefore, the writ must be administered with the initiative and flexibility essential to insure that miscarriages of justice within its reach are surfaced and corrected".

Next, I will share with you what happened in Wisconsin legal system.