PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST NO RESPONSE

ILLEGAL VOTING v. ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT

THE "DON" Our President has promised that anyone caught voting improperly would be subjected to "maximum criminal penalties".

I say the same should apply to those government officials responsible for illegal imprisonment.

Our former U.S. Attorney General Sessions said; "fraud in voting process will not be tolerated.  Fraud also corrupts the integrity of the ballot".

I say fraud in the legal system should not be tolerated because it corrupts the integrity of the rule of law.

There is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud in the United States.  However, there is plenty of evidence of illegal imprisonment in the United States.

WISCONSIN LEGAL SYSTEM v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS part 2

The Honorable Michael J. Dwyer Branch 16, State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Milwaukee County case 16-CV-8841 Lee v. Litscher, Sec. Wis. Dept. of Correction issues a "NOTICE and ORDER for BRIEFING", November 22, 2016, rather than a hearing before the court to safeguard individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless State action.  This briefing order can take years to complete.

The question is whether or not Lee should be released from custody under 973.01(4m)(a) Act 28.  A law that states:  "The department may discharge a person from extended supervision after he has served 2 years of extended supervision if the person met the conditions of extended supervision and the reduction is in the interest of justice".

Act 28 early release laws became law in 2009. Retroactive for all crimes committed beginning December 31, 1999.  It was repealed in 2011 by Act 38.  In 2014 the Wisconsin Court of Appeals determined the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time (early release from prison) by Act 38 violated the ex post facto clause of the state and federal constitutions.  In 2016 the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed. . ., holding (1) the retroactive repeal of positive adjustment time is an ex post facto violation, and (2) 2011 Wis. Act 38 violates the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because it results in a longer period of incarceration and, consequently, makes the punishment for an offense more burdensome after it was committed.  This is the law under Wisconsin Legal System.

It appears that the Wisconsin Legal System's intentions are to have every prisoner complete his original sentence no matter what the law commands.

WISCONSIN LEGAL SYSTEM v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Habeas Corpus is "YOU HAVE THE BODY" 

I filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus November 15, 2016 case number 16CV008841.  It was assigned to the Honorable Michael J. Dwyer, Branch 16.  The fee of $168.00 was returned; "There is no charge for a writ of habeas" according to Chief Judge Maxine A. White.

I know Judge Michael J. Dwyer he and I were members of the same Milwaukee Rotary Club back in the 80's.

A writ of habeas corpus is a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that a prisoner be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody.  The State of Wisconsin had custody of my body and I objected because the Supreme Court of the United States has "recognized the fact that [t]he writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action"  "Therefore, the writ must be administered with the initiative and flexibility essential to insure that miscarriages of justice within its reach are surfaced and corrected".

Next, I will share with you what happened in Wisconsin legal system.

I CAN VOTE AGAIN

I completed my State of Wisconsin imprisonment sentence on Friday July 27th and now I can vote again.  When our enslaved ancestors got close to voting rights according to Katharine Gerbner assistant professor of history at the University of Minnesota, slaveowners changed the rules of the game.

How did they do it?  They created the idea of "whiteness".  Who replaced the slaveowners?  Government officials and rich religious men seeking political power to control economics and education.

Today I have chosen to cast my ballot by mail.  My vote is secret.  I will secretly vote on the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000,000.00, for flood control purposes and the levying of the tax of the district in payment thereof.

Now if this passes how can I improve my economic status?  I have established my education so I should be able to figure this out.

JULY 27, 2018 AT 12.01 AM FREEDOM FROM WISCONSIN PRISON SYSTEM!

This has been a 13 year captive experience initiated by Uncle Tom/Aunt Sally negroes and controlled under a white supremacy legal system that had its beginnings in 2000 at Milwaukee Wisconsin Harambee Community School.  A bias racist criminal investigation that resulted in a bogus conviction in 2005.  The count down begins 16 days left and I take control of my body again without government interference.

How To Get Away With White-Collar Crime: GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS COMMITTING WHITE COLLAR CRIME...

How To Get Away With White-Collar Crime: GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS COMMITTING WHITE COLLAR CRIME...: PEOPLE WHO HAVE HIGHER LEVELS OF SELF-COMPASSION TEND TO HANDLE STRESS BETTER - THEY HAVE LESS PHYSICAL STRESS RESPONSE WHEN THEY WRONGFULLY...

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS COMMITTING WHITE COLLAR CRIME

PEOPLE WHO HAVE HIGHER LEVELS OF SELF-COMPASSION TEND TO HANDLE STRESS BETTER - THEY HAVE LESS PHYSICAL STRESS RESPONSE WHEN THEY ARE WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED, FACED WITH A RACIST JUDGE OR DON'T GET RELEASE WHEN THE LAW DEMANDS IT.

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Order Lee v. Department of Corrections

February 21, 2018 the Court of Appeals issued Opinion and Order in the case 2017AP980 Lee v. DOC.

The Appeals Court issued Summary Disposition Order: "Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court of this State as precedent or authority, except for the limited purposed specified in Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3)."

"Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.  We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.  The concern is that a motion for reconsideration not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order when that time has expired."